Log in

No account? Create an account

January 8th, 2004 - Stop Dean — LiveJournal

About January 8th, 2004

Dean is a threat to national security 03:13 pm
"Senate Candidate Calls Dean Threat To National Security" Jim Davenport, Associated Press, 1/7/04


Presidential hopeful Howard Dean is used to taking shots from Republicans and even fellow Democrats on the national level, now he's got to contend with criticism from a former South Carolina attorney general running for senator.

In releasing a television ad Wednesday, U.S. Senate candidate Charlie Condon said Dean is "a real threat to American security."

The "Howard Dean Democrats oppose America taking the fight to Saddam Hussein and terrorist havens overseas. They're just wrong," Condon says in the ad. It's Condon first TV advertisement in a crowded GOP primary race to fill the seat of retiring Sen. Ernest "Fritz" Hollings, D-S.C.

Condon implies that Dean "wouldn't do anything about a threat coming from outside of America," said Delacey Skinner, Dean's South Carolina campaign spokeswoman. "That's just false." Dean has "been very clear about the fact that as commander in chief he'd be willing to do what was necessary to defend the country," she said.

Condon said people need to know about Dean's opposition to the Bush administration's pre-emption doctrine, which calls for striking nations that harbor terrorists. In the past, Dean has said the country is no safer since Saddam has been captured.

"If Howard Dean cannot see the obvious fact that Americans, Iraqis and the entire world is safer now that Saddam is gone from power, then Howard Dean represents not just a bad choice for president, but a real threat to America's future," Condon said Wednesday.

As the Democrats' likely nominee, Condon said, Dean is a person who could "come into authority and power and threaten the very security of this country."

Condon's criticism expanded to Dean's supporters.

"The Howard Dean Democrats take us back to the time before September 11th when America ... would only respond if the United Nations approved. We cannot go back to that position," he said. Condon compared Dean and his supporters to isolationists that failed to act against fascism in the 1930s.

The criticism of Dean supporters "makes it that much more insulting," Skinner said.

Condon used the commercial to call on Democratic Senate candidate Inez Tenenbaum to say where she stood on Dean and first strikes against terrorism.

Tenenbaum said the ad says less about Dean than Condon, known for his years as a sharp-tongued attorney general. Condon has been has been much milder so far in this race and in the months following his failed bid for the GOP gubernatorial nomination in 2002.

"There is no new Charlie Condon," Tenenbaum said. "This is one more political gimmick ... to draw attention to himself."

Tenenbaum said she supports "our country's efforts in Iraq and the war on terrorism" and the work troops are doing in "trying to bring democracy to Iraq and in capturing Saddam Hussein." She also said she has not endorsed a Democratic presidential candidate.

The ads initially will air only on cable channels, including Fox News, Condon said.

Those fucking corrupt Dean staffers 06:36 pm

January 8, 2004

Dear Jeanni,

I'm distressed to learn that staffers from the Dean campaign are misrepresenting themselves as Iowa caucus-goers to gain advantage against our campaign. You should know this is not how we campaign in Iowa, and I demand that you take action to remove these staffers from the Dean campaign immediately.

Today, your National Campaign Manager, Joe Trippi was on CNN stating that people from outside Iowa were coming to the state to help Dean, and they never would lie in order impact the outcome of the caucus. If your hired staff are already misrepresenting themselves today in communities like Creston, how can any Iowa voter trust that your campaign will prevent volunteers from engaging in the same illegitimate activity on January 19th.

The Iowa Democratic Party has fought for decades to preserve the honesty and purity of the grassroots caucus system. Today's revelations jeopardize that hard work, and no Iowa Democrat should stand for it.

On Tuesday, a young man came into our Creston office and said he was a resident of Red Oak, Iowa. He claimed he was in town for business, working at a local farm. He asked numerous questions about what our staff did, the territory they covered, and what type of folks we were calling in Creston. Our staff was immediately suspicious.

The next day, a different young man came into the office and identified himself as Mark Evans. He said that he was the new manager at the local HYVEE, and that he and his wife just moved from Georgia. He started Asking questions about our operation and began snooping around the office. Our staffers were confident they had seen him wearing a Dean sticker around town, so they asked him why he had come into the office. He said that he was an undecided Iowa caucus-goer, and was interested in politics.

Today, this second man, "Mark Evans," returned to the Creston office and admitted that he and his friend had lied, and that they were employed by your campaign. He identified himself as Mitch Lawson, who moved here from Georgia to work for Dean. According to Mitch, "We came into your office to find out information and get your calling scripts from you."

In order for Iowans to trust that the caucuses will be free of further Dirty tricks, these two men should be asked to leave your campaign immediately. The sanctity of the Iowa Caucus depends on it. If your folks are lying today, what's to stop them from stealing the caucus from Iowa voters for Howard Dean on January 19th.


John Norris

The Lost Dean Tapes 07:05 pm
NBC uncovered a bunch of old Dean tapes, which he flip flops on a zillion different things and TRASHES THE CAUCUSES

Harsh remarks on caucuses
"If you look at the caucuses system, they are dominated by the special interests in both parties," he said. "[And] the special interests don't represent the centrist tendencies of the American people. They represent the extremes. And then you get a president who is beholden to either one extreme or the other, and where the average person is in the middle."

He added, "Here's what happens: Say I'm a guy who's got to work for a living, and I've got kids and so forth. On a Saturday, is it easy for me to go cast a ballot and spend 15 minutes doing it, or do I have to sit in a caucus for eight hours? ... I can't stand there and listen to everyone else's opinion for eight hours about how to fix the world."

Tale of the tape on Howard Dean
NBC: Old TV shows answer some questions
By Mark Murray
and the NBC Investigative Unit
NBC News
Updated: 5:20 p.m. ET Jan. 08, 2004
WASHINGTON - Aired in Canada and PBS stations in the United States, "The
Editors" is a public affairs TV show that most Americans probably haven't
seen. It features a roundtable panel of politicians, journalists, and policy
wonks who discuss American and Canadian politics, foreign affairs, and
social issues.

But old episodes of the "The Editors" might soon become must-see TV for
followers of the 2004 presidential race. While governor of Vermont, Howard
Dean was a regular guest on the show, and the NBC News Investigative Unit
has now obtained the videotapes of 90 of his appearances from 1996 to 2002.
They help answer one of the race's biggest questions: Just who is Howard
Dean? Is he the angry, liberal, combustible flip-flopper that his opponents
and some chattering pundits claim he is? Is he, as other rivals suggest, too
conservative when it comes to guns, trade, and balancing the budget? Is he
ignorant on foreign policy issues? Or is he the magnetic, straight-talking
candidate his admirers say he is?

As reported by Lisa Myers on NBC's "Nightly News," Dean comes across in
these tapes as having a wide-ranging intellect, a sharp tongue, and shifting
views on some key issues.
Yet he also shows that he's much more consistent on issues - like
affirmative action and trade - than some of his opponents give him credit
for. And despite the constant complaints that Dean has no foreign policy
experience, he demonstrates a good grasp of international affairs.
According to Ann McFeatters, the Washington bureau chief for both the
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the Toledo Blade who has also been a regular
guest on the show, the Dean you see on "The Editors" is the same Dean you
see on the campaign trail. "He is very smart, likes an argument, likes to
claw around and through a problem, and does speak his mind," she said.
In fact, the most newsworthy revelations from these tapes are more examples
of Dean speaking his mind, sometimes making statements that could arguably
come back to hurt him. For instance, in a show that aired almost exactly
four years ago, Dean made some less-than-flattering comments about caucuses
in the presidential nominating process - the very same type of caucuses that
will occur in Iowa on Jan. 19, where some polls show him to be leading.

Harsh remarks on caucuses
"If you look at the caucuses system, they are dominated by the special
interests in both parties," he said. "[And] the special interests don't
represent the centrist tendencies of the American people. They represent the
extremes. And then you get a president who is beholden to either one extreme
or the other, and where the average person is in the middle."
He added, "Here's what happens: Say I'm a guy who's got to work for a
living, and I've got kids and so forth. On a Saturday, is it easy for me to
go cast a ballot and spend 15 minutes doing it, or do I have to sit in a
caucus for eight hours? ... I can't stand there and listen to everyone
else's opinion for eight hours about how to fix the world."
Regarding Al Gore, the very man who endorsed him in December, Dean said back
in a January 1998 show: "He has a lot of attributes, but ... there are some
things that I am concerned about. One of them is being quick on your feet.
He is not."
In another January 1998 episode, he also speculated that there "will
probably be good and bad" if Hamas takes control over the Palestinian
leadership. Yasser Arafat, he said, "is going to leave the scene. ... When
that happens, I think Hamas will probably take over. There will probably be
good and bad out of that. The bad, of course, is that Hamas is a terrorist
organization. However, if they have to run a quasi-state they may actually
have to be more responsible and start negotiations. So who knows what will
But then he said this in February 1999 appearance: "The next great tragedy
is going to be Arafat's passing, believe it or not. I'm not a fan of
terrorism or Arafat. But the truth is that what's happening here is [former
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu has thrown away the chance of a
lifetime to negotiate with people he could negotiate with. Next comes Hamas,
comes far more radical government in Jordan ... which may ally itself with
Iraq. I think it's a frightening proposition."
A Dean spokeswoman points out that these quotes were cut from nearly 100
appearances, but she says Dean does wish he had been "more artful" in some
of his comments.
In addition, Dean said some things on "The Editors" that might be considered
flip-flops from his current statements on the campaign trail. In an
appearance after the 2000 presidential election, Dean made this comment
about his former fellow governor, George W. Bush. "George Bush, I believe,
is in his soul a moderate." That's certainly a contrast from this remark,
which he said this November: "I believe that George Bush's philosophy in
life is, if you're rich you deserve it and if you're poor you deserve it."
And Dean seemed to display a sharp tongue a few times on the show. In an
April 1998 discussion on welfare policy, one panelist remarked that 80
percent of children who are born to single mothers end up on welfare. Dean
lashed out at that statement. "That is absolute crap. This is absolute
unmitigated garbage." (Welfare experts at the Brookings Institution and at
the Center for Economic and Policy Research say Dean is most likely correct,
certainly according to welfare rolls in the 1990s.)
But other frequent guests on "The Editors" don't believe that Dean ever
demonstrated a temper. William Powers, a media critic at National Journal
magazine, notes Dean always relished a good debate on the show. "He was
combative and seemed to enjoy the combat." But Powers, who wrote a 2002
article in National Journal about Dean's appearances on the program,
stresses he was never the angry person that his critics accuse him of being.
"You never got a sense of real hostility."
"I never saw him to have a temper. I saw him shoot from the hip," added R.
Emmett Tyrrell Jr., the conservative editor in chief of the American
Spectator who often sparred with Dean on the show. "That's a difference."
Tyrrell says, however, that Dean was often prone to "talk down to everyone
around him."
Still, despite the controversial statements, the flip-flops, and occasional
heated comments, Dean's appearances on "The Editors" also show he has been
more consistent on some issues than his opponents say he is. Although in
1995 he once said that affirmative action should be based on class rather
than race - a statement that rivals like Al Sharpton and Dick Gephardt have
pounced on - Dean was extolling the virtues of affirmative action back in a
1997 appearance. "I think that this country needs affirmative action in
order to succeed as a diverse society," he said.
'Nervous about NAFTA'
In addition, while Dean has been critical about free trade on the campaign
trail, some of his opponents have blasted his earlier support of the North
American Free Trade Agreement. Yet in a February 1998 episode of "The
Editors," Dean said he was already having second doubts about that support.
"I'm a little nervous about NAFTA. I was a big supporter four years ago. I'm
worried about the condition of Mexican workers around the maquiladoras. And
I had hoped that NAFTA would boost the Mexican standard of living." Such a
statement seems to contradict Gephardt's current argument that Dean's doubts
about NAFTA and free trade are an "11th-hour conversion."
Dean has also been consistent about his opposition to tax cuts, including
his desire to roll back the tax rates to their levels during the Clinton
Administration. "There is such a thing as a bad tax cut," he said in an
October 1996 appearance. "It took Reagan's tax cuts, which were
irresponsible, to create an enormous deficit, which has finally 12 years
later come home to roost and force us to reduce spending."
"I'm very satisfied with the income tax levels in the United States right
now," he added in a later appearance that year. "I think they are about
And finally, even though his experience in government hasn't extended beyond
Vermont's borders, his statements on "The Editors" demonstrated a fairly
good understanding of international affairs. On one show taped in November
2000, Dean said: "I think cooler heads will eventually prevail in the Middle
East - unless, of course Netanayhu makes a return. I actually think Pakistan
is a far more dangerous place right now; it is a shell of a country waiting
to be taken over, essentially, by radical Islamists and that is going to
destabilize all of central Asia."
Other concerns
There's more from that appearance. "I also think we have to be very
concerned about Venezuela and Colombia," he said. "Here we have two
democracies which are now sliding backwards and being threatened with
extinction. ... That's in our own hemisphere."
Impressed by Dean's performance during this episode, host Keith Morrison
said, "I think the governor should be the secretary of state." Dean's reply
was certainly diplomatic. "I've got plenty of trouble in Vermont."
Mark Murray is the off-air political reporter for NBC News. NBC's Jim
Popkin, Michelle Jaconi, Huma Zaidi, Katie Buckley, Abigail Wuellner, Adam
Radin, Lindsay Breedlove, Julie Grauert, Katie Kennedy, and Aretae Ortiz
contributed to this article.
Top of Page Powered by LiveJournal.com